Skip to content

Unify flag handling#504

Merged
Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) merged 59 commits into
mainfrom
313_unify_flag_handling
May 28, 2026
Merged

Unify flag handling#504
Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) merged 59 commits into
mainfrom
313_unify_flag_handling

Conversation

@hiker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hiker Joerg Henrichs (hiker) commented Oct 10, 2025

This is getting reasonable stable, but it's currently blocked by #502 (which I need for kernel extraction in gungho). I will also verify that this works as expected with the UM.

@hiker Joerg Henrichs (hiker) marked this pull request as draft October 10, 2025 13:06
@hiker Joerg Henrichs (hiker) added enhancement New feature or request Blocked Blocked by another issue labels Oct 10, 2025
@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) changed the title 313 unify flag handling Unify flag handling Apr 7, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes a lot more sense now that I've been through UM #57. I've added a couple of suggestions inline. I leave it up to you whether you want to accept the suggestion of the automatic code quality tool or not!

Comment thread Documentation/source/advanced_config.rst Outdated
Comment thread source/fab/fab_base/site_specific/default/config.py
Comment thread source/fab/tools/flags.py Fixed
@hiker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the review, Sam Clarke-Green (@t00sa). I've addressed the issues, and brought the PR up to current main. Back to you.

@hiker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

This makes a lot more sense now that I've been through UM #57. I've added a couple of suggestions inline.

I am glad to hear that - I was hoping that this will be the case, that once you start using/modifying a build script, things fall into place!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks sensible to me. Unit tests pass successfully and we've used the same code in the UM testing branch. Approved.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reapproving

@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) changed the title Unify flag handling Unify flag handling wip May 28, 2026
@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) changed the title Unify flag handling wip Unify flag handling May 28, 2026
@t00sa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changing and reverting the name of the PR has fixed the WIP bot problem!

@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) merged commit c89acf9 into main May 28, 2026
9 checks passed
@t00sa Sam Clarke-Green (t00sa) deleted the 313_unify_flag_handling branch May 28, 2026 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request Ready for review Indicating that a PR is ready to be reviewed.

Projects

Status: Complete

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants